With the recent volatile financial markets, many 401k plan participants are asking for guidance on how to manage their 401k plan assets. To help answer provide some guidance, Charles Schwab & Co.* has released these six tips from Senior Vice President Mark W. Riepe, CFA. Participants should keep these tips in mind as they manage their 401k in today’s unpredictable market.
Here are Mr. Riepe’s six tips.
Keep Doing the Right Thing
Continue to make contributions to your retirement accounts. Our economy isn’t the greatest right now, but the fact remains that practically all of us will retire from the work force at some point in our lives. Even those of us who love work and can’t imagine doing anything else will come to a point where we can’t work any longer.
We need to be pay for our lifestyles during our retirement years somehow, and I believe Social Security is simply not going to cut it for most of us. That means we need a backstop, and that backstop is our own savings and investing.
Let’s take a look at a hypothetical example of the importance of regular saving and investing. Consider a 25-year-old in 1973 who got a job making $21,000 per year and saved 10% per year. This particular individual received a 3% cost of living increase every year, and a 10% promotional increase once every five years. The savings were invested in a diversified portfolio of stocks.
By sticking with the savings plan through thick and thin, and keeping that portfolio invested in stocks, despite the big short-term swings in value, this saver, under these hypothetical assumptions, had an account value of more than one million dollars by 2007.
Everyone’s situation is different, and this is merely one example, but this saver displayed particular traits that I believe are associated with long-term investing success. More importantly, these are traits that I believe you can replicate and use to improve your situation whatever your particular facts and circumstances may be.
Don’t Succumb to the Market Roller Coaster
It is common for people to have an emotional reaction to the market’s ups and downs. Emotions change as markets move through their normal cycles. As prices go up, we feel good about ourselves. Optimism turns to enthusiasm, then exhilaration, and peaks at euphoria. Inevitably, markets move both up and down. During the downward swings, our emotions turn darker, and they seem to be at their worst?despair?when the market news is the most bleak.
Many studies have documented how individual investors, and even professionals, chase performance. When markets are doing well, investors get less concerned about risk and put their money to work in investments that have been doing well recently. Too often that means investing while looking through a rearview mirror. In the real world, that simply doesn’t work out too well.
One recent example of this behavior was during 2006 and 2007. The stock markets in other countries were performing quite well. When we looked at mutual fund investors as a whole, almost all of the money that was going into stock funds was going into funds that invested in foreign stocks. This happened just in time for foreign stocks to do extremely poorly in 2008–in fact, much worse than U.S. stocks.
Now, don’t get me wrong. Generally, if you have money available, I think it’s a good idea to take some of your account and invest it in foreign stock funds as a way of diversifying away from any bad markets in the United States, but it’s all about finding the right balance. Good investing is rarely about having an all-or-nothing attitude, but that’s exactly what often happens when investors are always looking at yesterday’s good ideas.
Think About Risk
Investing is always about finding that delicate balance between our desire for high rates of return with the dread and pain that comes from losing our hard-earned money. Determining the level of risk you’re comfortable with is incredibly difficult and sometimes is revealed only when rough times, like now, arrive.
My general rule is that if you can’t sleep at night because you’re worrying about your investments, then you’re probably taking on too much risk. But before you make dramatic changes to your investment allocations, keep in mind that determining the right level of risk for your portfolio shouldn’t be solely driven by whether big swings in the value of your portfolio bother you. Your capacity for risk matters, as well.
Capacity refers to whether your financial situation allows you to take risks. For example, I generally encourage younger investors to be more aggressive because they have decades to make up any losses. Here’s why. Based on historical experience for the U.S. stock market from 1926 to 2007, during short periods of time, stocks have sometimes done incredibly well and, at other times, have done poorly. If you need to pull a large amount of money from your investments within the next year, the stock market is not a wise place to put it.
For those investors who are able to commit their money in the market for longer periods, the results have been much better. For example, the worst five-year period in the stock market had an annual average return of negative 12.5%. But when we look at all the five-year periods, 87% were positive, 97% of 10-year periods were positive, and since 1926, there’s never been a 20-year period where stocks lost money.
For younger investors, a heavy dose of mutual funds that invest in stocks will usually make sense. For older investors, those who have less time to make up for any losses, it makes sense for them to be less aggressive. Whatever the right risk tolerance is for you, review the options in your plan and select the ones that makes sense for your situation.
As I mentioned earlier, in order to choose the right level of risk in your account, you ultimately need to make a choice regarding how much of your account value you will be investing in stocks. That’s typically referred to as your asset allocation. In the example of our saver, the asset allocation was aggressive. In other words, the money in the account was invested in mutual funds that invest in stocks. That may not be appropriate for everyone.
Let’s assume that you’re more comfortable with taking your account and dividing it. You decide to put some money into mutual funds that invest in stocks and the rest into mutual funds that invest in bonds, or fixed income investments. That’s perfectly okay if it best matches your situation.
Rebalance Your Investments
My fourth recommendation is to stick with that allocation by rebalancing your investments from time-to-time.
For example, assume an investor chose to place 60% of his or her account into mutual funds that invest in stocks and 40% into mutual funds that invest in bonds. If left unattended, that percentage will change over time. If our investor had selected this allocation in 1994, by 1999 the account had become 79% stocks and 21% bonds. This is a much riskier account than it was originally set up to be. It became riskier because stocks did better than bonds during those five years, and gradually came to make up a bigger piece of the portfolio.
We suggest investors rebalance their portfolios to bring them back in line with what they had originally intended. Keep in mind that a portfolio with a large percentage in stocks would probably have done quite poorly during the so-called tech-wreck in the early part of this decade.
Let’s assume our investor had set up this asset allocation in the year 2000 and left it unattended. By the end of 2002, the account would have been 41% stocks and 59% bonds. This is a much lower level of risk than originally intended, and would also have been costly to the investor but in a different way. This investor, by not having enough invested in stocks, probably would not have gained as much during the years in the middle part of this decade.
What effect could rebalancing have on risk and return over time? Let’s consider the effect an annual rebalancing strategy had on the risk and return of a portfolio over a long period of time.
In our example, a rebalanced portfolio was less volatile, which I think most of us would agree is a good thing. The rebalanced portfolio also had slightly better returns. In this example, you’re able to see why we think rebalancing makes sense, because under certain conditions it can lower risk and increase return.
Rebalancing does require effort on your part. It requires you to periodically monitor your account and adjust either the amount you have invested in different investments, or to change how new contributions to your account are allocated. To make this process easier, your plan may have an investment choice where rebalancing is done for you automatically.
Periodic rebalancing is always a good idea, but it is particularly appropriate right now. Since the latter part of 2007 and in 2015, the stock market has periodically taken investors on a wild ride. It would not surprise me if you were to take a look at your account right now and find that it is out of balance and deserves some attention.
Take a Close Look at Your Account
While you’re rebalancing your account, take a close look at what’s in it. When you allocate your contributions, which investments are they going toward? Do you still feel good about those choices? Your plan might have added new choices since you enrolled. Now is a good time to take a look at those new choices and see if any of them make sense for you.
It’s also a good time to take a look at your contribution level. Does that level still make sense? For example, one suggestion I make to investors is to reconsider their contribution rate whenever they get a boost in their wages. Let’s say you contribute 5% of your pay to your 401k account. You then receive a 3% pay increase. I recommend taking part of your pay increase, for example, one-third of it, or 1%, and boosting your contribution rate to 6%. Doing this allows you to enjoy your good fortune today, and also helps secure your future.
Treat Your Account Like a Lockbox
This year has been tough for many working families. In times like this, it’s tempting to tap into your retirement savings accounts but the penalties and taxes will cost you in the short and long term.
Treat your retirement accounts as a lockbox, only to be opened when you reach retirement. Every one of us encounters unexpected financial difficulties at one point or another during our lives, including unexpected medical bills. In order to build sufficient wealth so that we’re able to retire we need to, as much as possible, emulate the saver we looked at earlier. That saver built wealth because through thick and thin, the contributions continued and he resisted the urge to withdraw from the account when times were tough.
Realistically, it’s impossible for me to sit here and say never touch the money in your 401k account prior to your retirement. It would be terrific if our lives played out in such a fortunate fashion. I do think, however, that withdrawing money from your retirement account should be a last resort.
Withdrawing money from a retirement account is very expensive, and, therefore, is a costly source of money. For example, if you withdraw money from a 401k prior to age 59½, not only do you need to pay taxes on the amount you withdraw, but you also owe a 10% penalty for withdrawing early.
Think about that for a moment. Imagine you have a $20,000 balance in your account and withdraw it all for some reason. You don’t get to keep the full $20,000. If you’re in a 20% tax bracket, you have to pay $4,000 in taxes plus another $2,000 in penalties. Suddenly, your $20,000 has shrunk to $14,000.
Time is our most precious asset, and stock markets can move with amazing speed and direction. What surprises many investors is that the stock market is forward-looking. It moves based on what conditions savvy traders think will occur in the future.
For example, right now, I think we’re in a recession and have been in one for some time. It seems like a bad time to be invested in stocks, right? That’s true up to a point. If we knew with perfect foresight that a recession was coming, it would make sense to avoid stocks. Unfortunately, that kind of crystal ball insight is a far rarer commodity than is generally supposed.
What matters for stock investors right now is when we’ll get out of this recession. If history is any guide, the stock market will start recovering well before the economy itself starts turning around. Historically, when that happens, the stock market tends to move up quickly.
In my experience, too many investors wait to get back into the stock market until after the economic storm clouds have cleared. Unfortunately for them, by waiting for the all-clear sign, much of the opportunity for gain is no longer there. If you’re investing in equity mutual funds, resist the temptation to try to time the market by jumping out of those funds and trying to get back in at just the right time.